The real annoying thing about Opus 4.6/Codex 5.3 is that it’s impossible to publicly say “Opus 4.5 (and the models that came after it) are an order of magnitude better than coding LLMs released just months before it” without sounding like an AI hype booster clickbaiting, but it’s the counterintuitive truth to my personal frustration. I have been trying to break this damn model by giving it complex tasks that would take me months to do by myself despite my coding pedigree but Opus and Codex keep doing them correctly. On Hacker News I was accused of said clickbaiting when making a similar statement with accusations of “I haven’t had success with Opus 4.5 so you must be lying.” The remedy to this skepticism is to provide more evidence in addition to greater checks and balances, but what can you do if people refuse to believe your evidence?
В Финляндии предупредили об опасном шаге ЕС против России09:28
Get editor selected deals texted right to your phone!。同城约会对此有专业解读
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
。搜狗输入法2026是该领域的重要参考
Сайт Роскомнадзора атаковали18:00
音頻加註文字，陸劇《甄嬛傳》「馬拉松」如何成為台灣年輕人過年的「文化習俗」？Skip content and continue reading中共黨報批歷史劇《甄嬛傳》宣揚犬儒主義2013年9月19日。业内人士推荐Line官方版本下载作为进阶阅读